[MPlayer-users] How to instruct mplayer to enable postprocessing with mpegpes? (NOVIRUS)

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Sat Dec 13 14:53:34 CET 2003


Hi

On Friday 12 December 2003 19:28, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> MN>> DRFI>> Sure, it may be useful if you have
> MN>> DRFI>> extremely low-quality video, but  something like
> MN>> pp=fq:15/hb:64:20/vb/dr DRFI>> with denoising afterwards will give
> similar MN>> results.
> MN>> DRFI>
> MN>> DRFI>The fq option should NEVER be used unless you have video from a
> MN>> DRFI>strange source that can't export quantizer tables. It will
> severely MN>>
> MN>> Well, what should I do if I'm not satisfied with the pp's level of
> MN>> deblocking, and want to increase it? Strangely though, in windows
> MN>> ffdshow's methods provide excellent deblocking quality, and in mplayer
> MN>hmm, could u provide some example video which looks better with
>
> Well, almost any very low-quality video with huge blocking/ringing/etc
> artifacts shows difference. I tested it with several low-quality
> tape->divx re-encodings in 320x240 resolution. Taking some kind of anime
> and scaling it to 320x240 while setting vqscale, say, to 15 also shows
can u upload such a video? (ftp://mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/incoming and tell us 
the filename) the only thing i see is that ffdshow adds alot of noise to the 
image no matter what options i set

[...]
-- 
Michael
level[i]= get_vlc(); i+=get_vlc();		(violates patent EP0266049)
median(mv[y-1][x], mv[y][x-1], mv[y+1][x+1]);	(violates patent #5,905,535)
buf[i]= qp - buf[i-1];				(violates patent #?)
for more examples, see http://mplayerhq.hu/~michael/patent.html
stop it, see http://petition.eurolinux.org & http://petition.ffii.org/eubsa/en



More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list