[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: [patch] lavc ME parameter handling cleanup & 2 little fixes

[Rémi Guyomarch]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:47:54PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Monday 22 April 2002 07:38, Rémi Guyomarch wrote:
> [...
> > > > PS: You are free to tell me that I'm on crack :-)
> > >
> > > You are on crack.
> > >
> > > Seriously, don't reorder the ME methods. Your reordering doesn't even
> > > make sense. AFAIK, LOG and PHODS are considerably slower AND lower
> > > quality than EPZS! FULL may or may not be better than EPZS.
> >
> > I took this order directly from avcodec.h, I didn't invented it.
> >
> > And yes, I didn't tried every ME algo, but IMHO if one is slower *and*
> > worst than EPZS, it should be simply deleted. Why keep it ?
> for testing

Ok, so the table is not needed because there's only one "recommended"
choice for production encoding : EPZS, did I get it ?

-- 
Rémi