[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: libvo2, 1st proposed spec

[David Holm]

Arpi wrote:

>Hi,
>
>>>>ah yes, and about mp1e, I read through the sources a couple of times and 
>>>>found it messy, and then to get users to understand on how to integrate 
>>>>it with mplayer will be perhaps as hard as to implement it in our 
>>>>devices, rte is a statical lib which wraps ffmpeg and mp1e under one 
>>>>
>>>i don't want to see ffmpeg twice. same as libac3 problems.
>>>we have already support for libavcodec, we just need mp1e then.
>>>
>>well I could go through rte and see how it implements mp1e, but I think 
>>it's gonna be a mess to instruct users on how to set up mp1e... or 
>>option 2, they don't and we compile in the whole thing (unnecessary 
>>audiocode and so on)...
>>
>
>we need just a very fast mpeg encoder, i think it's mp1e.
>is rte just a wrapper around mp1e and libavcodec, or it does change
>(speedup?) mp1e?
>
>>when we switch to libvo2, can't we just wipe libavcodec and ffmpeg.so 
>>from every file in the mplayer tree and introduce rte?
>>
>heh? why should we wipe out ffmpeg/libavcodec? it's mainly used for decoding.
>
>i just want to _add_ mp1e support for faster mpeg encoding requires for
>mpeg-only cards like dvb and dxr3.
>
is it ok with a main/mp1e dir like main/libavcodec looks today, and a 
readme for users on how to obtain mp1e and unpack it there, it'll create 
a mess (in the mp1e dir), but there is no actual lib interface to mp1e, 
the alternative would be taking the mp1e code and making alterations to 
it and add it to the project (read prior post).

>
>
>>or are you planning to retain libvo when libvo2 is done?
>>
>no
>
>
>A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
>
>--
>mailto:arpi at thot.banki.hu
>http://esp-team.scene.hu
>_______________________________________________
>MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
>MPlayer-dev-eng at mplayerhq.hu
>http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng
>