[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: libvo2, 1st proposed spec

[David Holm]

Arpi wrote:

>Hi,
>
>>>>ah yes, and about mp1e, I read through the sources a couple of times and 
>>>>found it messy, and then to get users to understand on how to integrate 
>>>>it with mplayer will be perhaps as hard as to implement it in our 
>>>>devices, rte is a statical lib which wraps ffmpeg and mp1e under one 
>>>>
>>>i don't want to see ffmpeg twice. same as libac3 problems.
>>>we have already support for libavcodec, we just need mp1e then.
>>>
>>well I could go through rte and see how it implements mp1e, but I think 
>>it's gonna be a mess to instruct users on how to set up mp1e... or 
>>option 2, they don't and we compile in the whole thing (unnecessary 
>>audiocode and so on)...
>>
>
>we need just a very fast mpeg encoder, i think it's mp1e.
>is rte just a wrapper around mp1e and libavcodec, or it does change
>(speedup?) mp1e?
>
>>when we switch to libvo2, can't we just wipe libavcodec and ffmpeg.so 
>>from every file in the mplayer tree and introduce rte?
>>
>heh? why should we wipe out ffmpeg/libavcodec? it's mainly used for decoding.
>
oh, I only thought it was used in mpegpes (and now dxr3) for encoding... 
then I understand why you don't want to switch to rte... I'll dig deeper 
and come up with a solution that is simple for both users and developers 
to use mp1e....

>
>
>i just want to _add_ mp1e support for faster mpeg encoding requires for
>mpeg-only cards like dvb and dxr3.
>
>>or are you planning to retain libvo when libvo2 is done?
>>
>no
>
>
>A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
>
>--
>mailto:arpi at thot.banki.hu
>http://esp-team.scene.hu
>_______________________________________________
>MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
>MPlayer-dev-eng at mplayerhq.hu
>http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng
>