[MPlayer-dev-eng] liba52 vs. libac3
Nick Kurshev
nickols_k at mail.ru
Tue Dec 18 08:47:37 CET 2001
Hello, Arpi!
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:23:18 +0200 (CEST) you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is planned to remove libac3 (replace by liba52) as soon as possible.
> Why?
> - liba52 is better designed, its API is better for our needs
> - liba52 is more standards (dolby etc conformant, and also supports more
> modes and formats
> - liba52 is maintained by Walken, libac3 is not.
> - liba52 is faster at C level, thanks to some tricks (downmix in freq space etc)
>
> But...
> - libac3 has lots of 3dnow (mmx too?) optimization mostly by Nick
I'll add it when I'll get some more free time.
(Probably in the next year - (jan - feb) ;)
> - libac3 has some sse optimization (by Nick & Atmos ?)
>
> Why ASAP?
> - maintaining 2 libs for teh same purpose in paralell is waste of time
>
[snip]
> A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
>
> --
> mailto:arpi at thot.banki.hu
> http://esp-team.scene.hu
> _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
> MPlayer-dev-eng at mplayerhq.hu
> http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng
>
Best regards! Nick
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list